About Me

Name:Mick O.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Can you tell people's political party by their footwear?

I can. But it's easy when you live in liberal Mill Valley. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a Democrat. And there's an Obama sign in every other yard.
 
What surprises me is the number of those ugly Crocs I see. You know, those plastic gardening shoes they sell for about $5 a pair? Can you believe that anyone would think that a pair of green, plastic shower shoes are considered dresswear?
 
Second place goes to the leather slip ons with no back. They used to be called sabots (I think).
 
Third place goes to the leather klogs.
 
What do these three shoes have in common? They are easy to slip on... just like liberal policies... gutless! Just as liberal policies are easy to buy if you are a Democrat because they absolve people completely of their personal responsibilities. And just like their policies, their shoes reflect their sheep-like personalities.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain, Hussein, Insane!

Can you believe that political correctness has finally come to this? The movement has always been about silencing people, regardless of "freedom of speech". You have freedom to speak, just not those words!
 
Now there is a big flap over a political rally that was held for John McCain and the conservative talk show host from Cincinnatti who used Barack Hussein Obama's complete name. It's his friggin' name, for Christ's sake. Now we can't use people's names and if we do, it's an attack? Give me a BREAK!
 
Barack should change his name then. Either that or (stop the presses) tell people, "Hey, it's my name. Forget about it! Get over it!"
 
And McCain, true to form, has issued an apology! Instead of looking like a strong president he looks like a craven coward. What a joke.
 
Several thoughts came to me this week... McCain should be outraged that people are using his first name, John, because it harkens to a toilet, and that's insulting. He should also be outraged that people are using his last name McCain because it rhymes with "insane" and, incredibly, like "Hussein"!
 
In the other political party, Barack should be upset that people are using his first name because it rhymes with "Iraq", and we know what a negative connotation that has with liberals and Democrats. We already know why we can't use his middle name, Hussein. That leaves his last name. But we can't use that because Obama sounds too much like Osama! Even Ted Kennedy couldn't get it right.
 
So what are we left with? That young, black guy against that old white guy. Hey, that's a good bumper sticker.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another example of vegans at odds

I have been quiet for the last couple of days, but several thoughts hit me yesterday and I will try and articulate them this morning in a series of posts.
 
First of all, let's talk about the natural food, vegans who are probably all anti-oil. Where do they think that pleather comes from? Sure they don't want to support the killing of cows as meat or leather, so they wear synthetic substitutes. Problem is, they are also probably against oil, drive a hybrid, but don't realize how many of our plastics come from oil products... including that pleather jacket they are wearing.
 
My point is this. Many people are against things. Especially here in Mill Valley. Problem is, they are hypocrites in the fact that there is no getting away from the very things they are protesting! Not sure if I made my point or not, but it makes sense to me.
 
Hybrids are a good example. The Toyota "Pious" has its own theme song now. As annoying as it is (I turn the sound off when it comes on), they still use gasoline. So how does that really help the environment, especially since our population is growing and the amount they save will be offset by new drivers in a very short time... More to come...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The END of Democracy? We're there!

I was just looking at a website which is very scary indeed. The essence of the article is about radical Muslims taking over and destroying our country, but it also suggests that liberals and their policies are to blame for America's downfall. It says:
 
History has proven that democracies are temporary in nature as it will only exist until the public realizes that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. After that time, they will vote for the politicians who promise the best goodies. I think Obama is the best at this... even better than Hillary.
 
His message is more subtle than hers, but is no less liberal in nature. Hers talks about issues too narrow (as in her Christmas gifts advertisement) to appeal to the general public, while his is more magnanimous and inclusive so that, even if you don't qualify for government benefits, you think you will.
 
So we're there. End of democracy. Too bad too. I am reading a biography of Washington and this was not his vision at all. I think he would be ashamed of what passes these days as statesmen and women... Shame on them.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama and our emotional reserves

Rush Limbaugh has pointed this out repeatedly. People only have so much in emotional reserves which is why Iraq has essentially gone away (except to the fine young men and women over there doing the heavy lifting!). As a result, the newspapers and other mainstream "driveby" media have shifted their focus to the next new thing because Americans (probably people in general), for better or worse, have a short attention span.
 
Next topic? Rockstar Obama who has people fainting at his rallies. That's what we want, a black John Lennon running the country. Problem is, his policies are still liberal! Big government control and higher taxes. This is a new idea??? This is change? It's exactly what has ruined great states like Louisiana and Michigan; liberal policies. Is it ever pointed out that continued voting for Democrats has ruined both of these states? NO! But I digress.
 
George Washington (from his biography by Paul Johnson) said that in his day, idealism is was what gets people interested in the beginning, but self interests are what perpetuate their actions. In other words, patriotism is what got the colonists to go to war during the Revolution, but what they would get out of it, i.e. land, status, control, was what kept them fighting even after suffering staggering losses. Take the promise of rewards away, and interest will follow. Washington noted that soldiers went of fighting for love of pay or promotions. 
 
Fast forward to today and see what our government has done to our self interests... taxed them, penalized them, put restrictions on them... but not so much that people stop producing, just enough to control the population and give to those who don't produce. This is what Obama is capitalizing on. He talks about change, but what change is he actually proposing? Sounds like more of the same to me.
 
Here's what I think. The United States politicians have over time erroded the American "ideal" by chipping away at our way of doing things in the guise of having our best interests at heart. (If it's in our best interests, why are they not subject to many of the laws that they pass?) Anyway, this is where we are, and so people are becoming more and more dependent on government. So are we surprised when a politician comes along and promises change they start fainting? I'm not! But he's not going to change anything. In fact, I predict it will be more of the same liberal policies that are hurting the greatness of our country. Shame.
 
One thing I see is this; the election cycle started way too early for there not to be some sort of lull before the general election. Perhaps the novelty of a black man finally being a front runner as a presidential candidate will last, but I don't think so. Eventually Obama will have to say something of substance. Rather than utter platitudes and vagaries, he is going to have to put forth some specifics if he expects to become president. Once those specifics come out, I am betting that the novelty of a black man running for president will trump anything he says policy-wise... and we'll get another Jimmy Carter. You'll see.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi is a HACK!

Rush reported last week that the FISA bill was being held up by congress though it passed in the senate. Now why do you suppose that would be? President Bush waited to leave on his trip so that he could push for the bill, but Pelosi decided to take a recess anyway... leaving the US vulnerable to terrorists.
 
The US government forced the telephone companies to turn over records thanks to the FISA act and now these companies are being sued for invasion of privacy by tort lawyers. What a farce.
 
Democrats are responsible for the next attack on our country. All during the 9/11 hearings we heard how Bush failed to do this and Bush failed to do that. But now that he is doing something, Democrats are playing politics and letting the bill expire. PELOSI is a hack. It is politics as ususal and the country's security be damned. Shame on her!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Want a recession? Vote DEMOCRAT!

Listen to what Democrats are saying (both Hillary and Obama) about controlling businesses. If you want a recession, vote Democrat. Their stated policies will only deepen the economic slowdown we are experiencing, with or without the stimulus package!
 
They're not saying it openly. They are attacking certain segments of business such as big oil, but what they really want is to controll every aspect of our economy, and it will not stop with just tobacco or oil or health care. That's communism, folks. And it has been proven to fail.
 
I urge you to read Thomas Sowell's latest book on economics where he discusses how a centralized approach to managing the country's output has failed in the past, no matter the good intentions. Once again, it is a feel good approach as opposed to a sane approach. It is amazing that there are a number of highly educated people who still believe that this will work, even though it has been disproven over and over again. Can anyone say Russia?
 
Democrats and liberal Republicans have slowly and incrementally worked us into a state of dependency on the government. First by implementing the IRS, then requiring employers to withhold people's taxes for them, they have lulled us into thinking we are not being taxed as badly as we are. Any change in the tax rate only has a small effect on a weekly or bi-weekly paycheck and is hardly noticed.
 
Inch by inch they are legislating regulations on businesses that hurt and cripple our economy. Want manufacturing jobs? Forget it. They have been legislated into oblivion by heavy taxation and requiements to comply with the EPA, OSHA, the minimum wage and soon... health care!
 
Think I'm kidding? Check out San Francisco's latest attempt at being the first city to have every one of its citizens covered. Businesses with 20 or more employees MUST provide health care for their employees... whether they can afford it or not. How can a city government demand that a private business provide health care for its employees even if it is not economically feasible? And what about the people who use those products? Will we have to listen to them whine when the cost of a widget goes from $20 to $40 overnight? Or what about the businesses who decide they will move to Sacramento or Reno in order to get away from the oppressive government regulations so they can stay in business, thus creating newly unemployed people? Guaranteed that if Hillary is elected, this will be coming soon to a country near you!
 
This sort of thinking has moved our manufacturing jobs overseas! GET GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR!!! That's why it's called private!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary Clinton - what a hypocrite!

Surely you've heard by now that Hillary is trying to get Florida and Michigan delegates seated at the Democratic convention. Know why? Because both states went for her... Why? Because she was the only one on the ballot!!! Why? Because the Democratic party set out the rules that if these two states moved their primaries up their votes would not be counted and therefore, other candidates (who followed the rules) did not have their names on the ballot!!!
 
As usual, the Clintons don't want to play by the rules that were set up and want to change them in the middle of the game... in order to WIN! Do you really think that if both states had gone to Obama, that Hillary would have insisted those two states be counted? Bet your life on it that she wouldn't have cared.
 
The woman is power mad and wants the presidency at any cost. Regardless if it's fair or not, she will do her best to steal the election! Obama supporters beware!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bipartisan is NOT

Has anyone else noticed that when the media talks about bipartisanship it means that Republicans have sided with Democrats? Why is it that nobody ever talks about it when Democrats refuse to compromise their positions?

Bipartisanship means both sides need to give a little. But when Republicans (conservatives) stick to their position and insist that liberals cross the aisle, that's not considered bipartisanship. Why not? It's like saying, "I am ready to compromise as long as you decide to do it my way!"
 
That's all I have today. I am sick of it. Screw bipartisanship! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberalism is the WORST type of selfishness

Let me see if I can explain this in a way that people will understand. It makes sense to me, but sometimes putting things into words is a little more difficult. As with God, you can't explain it, you just believe.
 
Just so with liberalism. This morning it hit me as I listened to Friday's podcast of Rush Limbaugh, that his explanation of the events of the campus shooting was right on. This was a GUN FREE zone! So the gunman had no reason to fear that anyone would take him out before he accomplished his mission... to kill people. Just because the campus wished that it was a gun free zone doesn't make it so.
 
So I started asking myself some questions. Why are the same people who want to take the guns out of everyone's hands the same people who refuse to prosecute those who use them to commit crimes? Think about it. So the easy part will be to take away guns from law abiding citizens, but the hard, impossible really, part will be getting them from the crimminals.
 
There are actually people out there who think everyone is the same with the same wishes and desires and if we just reason with them all will be right with the world. We will have peace and everyone will sing Kumbaya or We are the World, hold hands and eat a tofu burger before driving off in their Toyota "Pious". Isn't that the ultimate form of selfishness?
 
First of all to think that their way is the ONLY way, and that their thinking is the same as GOD CONSCIOUSNESS. How self-centered. It's like those liberal programs. As long as the intent is right, the program must be good. It doesn't work, but don't look at the results. Of course the money spent on these programs would be better used if dropped off at the homeless shelter in a wheel barrow rather than filtered through the various public servants who syphon off their weekly salary before turning the crumbs left over to the needy. I often hear these people saying that they chose their job so they could give back... BULL! Selfishness, that's why they took the job. To pay their bills. To feed themselves and their children. To put gas in their Toyota "Pious". If you don't believe me, witness how they treat their "clients". That's what social workers call their cases now because it gives the homeless person more dignity. Like being called a client makes up for sleeping under a bridge.
 
I am very generous in my lifestyle and reward people for trying to do the right thing. I don't need the government syphoning off tax money that I earn to pay for people to do the good deeds for me. Simple as that. So in my opinion, liberals are actually selfish in that they would rather be taxed and let the government do the hard work rather than do it themselves. It's gutless and it's lazy. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are people catching on to Hillary?

Hillary keeps playing class warfare, but seems to be losing. Although Obama says much the same thing (when he is pinned down) he is not as vocal as Hillary about taking corporations' profits. Maybe people are finally catching on that if Hillary does what she says, they could lose their jobs and/or investments. After all, if politicians can take the profits of corporation how are they supposed to pay dividends on their stocks? How are they supposed to expand their work force? Every day she shows more and more how she would do well in a communist society but not in a free market!
 
After all, what about Big Politics? Shouldn't their profits be taken too? Bill Clinton has made more money after leaving office than he did before he became president. So why not take those windfall profits and put them into a fund for developing tobacco products? Oh, that's right. Tobacco is BAD. Non-smokers are GOOD.
 
Day by day, Hillary has presented bad idea after bad idea. Since her Christmas "giveaway" commercials, she has continued to show who she really is. A Rush Limbaugh listener suggested Republicans in Texas and Ohio to cross over and vote for Obama so she can be defeated once and for all. As in the Wizaard of Oz, we want to see those dead legs sticking out from under that house!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More on the Berkeley protests

Anti-Americanism is spreading. Recently I did an article about Berkeley City government asking the Marine recruiter office to leave the city. Today I see this same sentiment has also popped up in Toledo, Ohio and Boulder, Colorado. What do these cities have in common???
 
Colleges! If you think our education system is not being run by liberals, think again. The University of Toledo has protested just about everything from Karl Rove to China (look it up in Google and use the keywords "Toledo" and "protest") so it's not surprising that anti-military sentiment is included in their topics for activism. The same old chants, "hey, hey, ho, ho, [insert name here] has got to go..." How intelligent is that?
 
Boulder is home of the University of Colorado and they are outdoing Toledo. They are protesting the word "God" in the pledge. Rather than choosing NOT to say the pledge in protest, they want the word taken out for everyone... even those who want it in! Isn't that the type of thing that Hitler tried to do?
 
So much for free speech. Kids need to get back in school and learn the difference between there's and theirs. Forget politics until you are literate enough to talk about it!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialism for dummies

Glenn Beck prompted this update. Apparently he debated a "pinhead progressive", as the woman described herself, who wanted to discuss the positive aspects of socialism. From what I can tell, Glenn's response was that history has proved that every attempt at this form of government has failed. Although I am not an insider, I gleaned that the woman finally came around... But I am not sure.
Here's the deal. As a recovered socialist from the 60's, I now see the folly of my ways. I was envious of those rich people because of what they had, not because of what they had contributed. In other words, I was a sixties hippie scumbag musician caught up in a hedonistic world of sex, drugs and alcohol, and rock and roll. It was all about my pleasure and screw the rest of the world. But what was my contribution and was I being compensated for it? Probably.
 
At 40 in 1989, I became a recovered alcoholic (I know the popular term is recovering, but the Big Book says recovered) by working the steps of the program and came to believe in 1992 that Bill Clinton was the man to change things in Washington. About 2 years into his term, I realized that a politician could say anything and usually is not held accountable by the media (because they LIE for liberals).
 
That's when I started listening to Rush Limbaugh. I hated him at first and would yell obscenities at the radio before turning it off. My liberal mindset and decisions were being challenged, and I didn't like it. But for some reason I was drawn back to the show, mostly because it aired on my sports channel, and I was probaby waiting for a baseball game.  I am not sure when the light came on; it was probably about taxes and the fact that people voting Democrat was the reason they kept increasing. Sure, they said they would only tax the rich. I was all for that because I was poor. Get those rich guys. Problem is, in the eyes of the IRS, I was also considered rich... only I didn't know it. I mean I must have been because at $22,000 a year I was only taking home about 60% of my paycheck, and I had a daughter to feed and clothe.
 
I have always had a resentment toward the IRS and would like nothing more than to see it abolished and replaced with the Fair Tax, but if politicians can't take money and redistribute to buy votes, what are they going to do??? And Democrats are the worst of the bunch. This doesn't let Republicans off the hook since there are a lot of tax and spend RINOS (Republicans In Name Only) out there, but the Conservative Ideal should be lower taxes, smaller government, less government intervention in our lives and more personal responsibility. If it gets the government out of it, I am for it... in most cases.
 
When people complain about the money we are spending on the military and security, I laugh and say that this is about the only thing the government is spending money on that is justified by the constitution! All this other social spending is just that; socialism. But because the people who are benefiting from government giveaway programs also get to vote, these programs continue into perpetuity whether they work or not.
 
As a socialist I was a hard worker. That's why I thought it was unfair that other people made millions while I only made thousands. And a lot of people who still tout socialism as the way to go are probably hard workers and are looking at it from their vantage point. Let's take one example.
 
I am close to real estate, and I am surprised at the number of liberals who are Realtors. Granted it is San Francisco, but if ever the work  ethic abounds, it is in these people. I often hear them say they are happy to pay taxes to support these programs and that we should pay our fair share. Great. Problem is, I don't agree and we are lumped into those who either don't care, or are happy to send money along to Washington. Because they have a majority of elected officials who agree with them, I am forced to go along with it.
 
But let's take socialism a bit further. What do you think these same Realtors would say if the Federal Government put a limit on what they could make in commission for selling a house. Right now they get 2.5-3% of the sales price. But the Feds could easily say that's too much because it causes housing inflation. In fact, Obama recently blamed Realtors for the current housing mess because they are running up the prices of housing. Can you believe it? Truth be told, buyers and sellers are running up prices because they think the values are there.
 
I almost wish someone would propose such legislation so I could hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth in the San Francisco Board of Realtors. After all, if the Federal Government can go after CEOs and limit their salaries, why can't they go after Realtors who are making a boat load of money on every sale?  Why not decide on an amount per sale to give to the Realtor and give the rest to a fund that provides services to the homeLESS? It's sort of related to real estate, is it not? After all, Hillary Clinton has proposed the Federal Government take the "windfall profits" of the oil companies and put it into an alternative energy fund. So how is real estate any different? Big OIL versus Big Real Estate!
 
So now I come to my final observation. Let's talk about all the jobs where a "tip jar" is involved. Did you know that Democrats and some RINOs decided some time ago that service people had to declare a certain percentage of their wages as tips (whether they earned them or not) and pay tax on that? These are the people who they say they are trying to help. The poor minimum wagers. And who do the poor minimum wagers keep electing? The Democrats and RINOs because when these liberals keep talking about taxing the rich, they do not think they are in that category. But they are.
 
I challenge anyone to look at their paycheck stub, regardless of income. You will find that roughly 50% is taken every pay period for governement purposes. At the end of the year, most of these people only get a small percentage of that back as a refund, if any. In fact, most people end up paying! Now who's RICH? And do you know who's getting that money? Agencies that give services to homeless, unemployed and often illegal aliens who have never paid a dime into the system.
 
But you might say, "it's the compassionate thing to do." Feed a man or woman a fish and you feed them for a day. Teach the man or woman to fish and you feed them for a lifetime. Giving people money is only a temporary fix. If they use it to learn to fish, then I am all for it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Want another 9/11? Vote Obama, Hillary or McCain!

Tuesday there was a vote in the Senate on the FISA (Foreign surveillance) and to his credit, John McCain voted for it. But how are we going to catch the bad guys when we close Gitmo and give the enemy combatants citizens' rights? What a wimp.
 
Obama voted against it. How are we going to catch the bad guys BEFORE they attack us? Call the psychic hotline?
 
Clinton didn't show up to even vote. Too self-centered about getting the presidency to do her job as senator? 
 
Just some observations from Thursday morning.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Berkeley... where else?

You've probably heard by now about the flap over the Berkeley, CA city council writing a letter basically asking the Marine recruiter to leave it's downtown location. They even gave a parking space right out front to Code Pink, a liberal anti-war group who picketed Nancy Pelosi's Pacific Heights home last year. Is anyone surprised?

Not me. When 9/11 happened, the Berkeley City government instructed the fire department to remove the American Flags from their vehicles because it might cause a riot! I stopped buying Cliff Bars at that point and let the company know that if they continued to do business in Berkeley, they would no longer get my dollars. They didn't seem to care, and they haven't gone out of business either.

As a member of MoveAmericaForward.org, I was alerted to the pro-troop protest that Melanie Morgan of KSFO Radio morning show fame helped organize, but could not attend. I did participate in the e-mail and blog campaign to contact the Berkeley City government, but could not make the rally. Apparently it got some attention. I was very please that they made the news last night; the news reports even had comments from pro-troop supporters... probably because the liberal Code Pink types were mostly high school students who were given credit for skipping school and attending the rally. Thanks to California's education system, they probably couldn't string 2 sentences together to create a decent sound byte!

This morning I received an e-mail from a friend in Arizona who heard about the flap. National attention! I like that. Anyway, his comments were, "Maybe there is some light at the end of the tunnel. Saw where the nuts in Berkeley backed off – isn’t it amazing what a little economic threat will do to the liberal consciousness. As Ron White would say, 'they have a lot of QUIT in them.'"

I used to say "Marin County... where else?" John Walker Lindh, the Sausalito group who was thrown out of China for protesting the occupation of Tibet. But now I say, "Berkeley... where else?" 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive