About Me

Name: Mick O.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Buckley's Son Is An Idiot...

Sorry, Bill, but your son, Christopher, is a moron. A recent column on The Daily Beast website quotes him as saying he will vote for Obama because of the following:
"Republican John McCain has betrayed his principals. McCain has changed positions on important issues, made promises he cannot keep, endorsed unworkable policies, and selected the inexperienced Sarah Palin as his running mate, Buckley writes."
 
This from the son of one great conservative of our times. Regardless of what positions McCain takes, they can not be as dangerous as the socialist agenda Obama will push once he has the White House and majorities in both the Senate and the House. The reason we are where we are is because Democrats are not afraid to push legislation when they are in power. Republicans seem to be afraid to govern like conservatives. But Obama has PROMISED to raise taxes. He has PROMISED all sorts of socialist programs. Why would anyone begrudge McCain for being soft on some things? At least he is RIGHT on some! Obama is NOT.
 
And then we come to the inexperience of Sarah Palin. Is this guy smoking crack? Sarah Palin is a hearbeat away... but Obama IS the heartbeat! He has less experience than Palin by a long shot. At least she has run a city and a state as mayor and governor. I just don't understand Buckley's insanity!
 
I have never been thrilled with McCain as our candidate. But against Obama, it is dumb and dumber. I'll leave it to you to decide who I think is which one!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Counting their chickens...

Democrats are counting their chickens before they have hatched when it comes to President Obama. The longer the campaign goes on (and it seems like it has lasted FOREVER!) the less enchanted citizens are becoming of the Democrats' choice for their candidate. As what happened in 2004, they put up the worst candidate they could find to run against a very vulnerable Bush.
 
This time they put all their eggs (back to the chickens metaphor) in a basket of the candidate they think has very little baggage and offers "hope" and "change". Once again, with a weak candidate on the Republican side, they are being guided by rabid anti-Bush liberals who are blind to the truth that Obama has no experience... in anything and would vote for Ariana Huffington if she were on the ticket! What they fail to realize is that the rest of us have a vote too.
 
I might vote Democrat if the right candidate presented him or herself. But Obama is not that person. He as all but told us that he is going to raise taxes and grow government, particularly because these two issues make Democrat wins more possible. And as weak as McCain is (Republicans have made a similar mistake but fortunately have chosen someone who at least has experience!) he is better than Obama. And I predict in the fall we will be talking about President McCain.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama; what does he really stand for?

Why is Obama getting a pass? Because he is black. Ferraro said it, and it's true. Americans want to see a black president so badly it will ignore anything of substance from this guy.

Ken Blackwell is a black Republican and has been elected twice as Ohio Secretary of State. The fact that I have to say that is a shame. Like white people can't criticize a person's politics because they don't share the same skin color? Isn't the president supposed to represent ALL people? |

Ken Blackwell also writes a column for the New York Sun. This particular column was written February 14, 2008.
Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun

It's an amazing time to be alive in America. We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first front running freedom fighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.

We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender.

Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.
The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.

Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.

Because the truth is that Mr. Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton.

Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.

Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant.

Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting past red and blue, to lead the United States of America. But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial "beauty."

Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats who have worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.

Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago. Yet Mr. Obama promises to raise taxes on "the rich." How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes. Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His solution to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.

Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, "All praise and glory to God!" but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have "hijacked" - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Illinois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood, and San Francisco values, not Middle America values.

The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of "bringing America together" means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs.

But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.

It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.

More information on Ken Blackwell can be found here: http://www.kenblackwell.com/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Meida lies about illegal immigration

As ususal, the mainstream media is ignoring the story about illegal immigration.
 
Because elected officials, for the most part, are ignoring the problem until after the election, concerned citizen groups are taking it upon themselves to do something about it. So what happens?
 
Radio talk show hosts are taking up the cross and talking about the movement, and guess what? Pro-illegal groups are demanding they be silenced under the guise as hate speech! Telling the truth is now hate speech! Read the story here. What happened to our free country? Little by little they are chipping away at our constitution and changing the rules so that eventually we will be living in a communist society. Government will decide what we can and can't say. They are doing it now incrementally, so it's not a silly notion. It is a fact.
 
I propose we take back America. FREEDOM OF SPEECH! Besides, when is telling the truth hate speech?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Reverse" Discrimination?

If there is such a thing, Obama has gotten away with saying nothing and not having to apologize for his minister's outrageous statements and hate America rhetoric. Why do you think this is?
 
Same as with Hillary who was "attacked" by Lazio in the Senatorial debates because she was the "girl", now Barack is above criticizm because he is black. It is pathetic.
 
If his minister hates America, then he should go somewhere else. The United States gives him the freedom to be a "butthead", but if he hates it so much, why doesn't he go to a country that he does like and respect and begin his life there?
 
Obama owes us an explanation and an apology. ALL OF US.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barack, you've got to be kidding...

Listen to his YouTube video and remember, if he does what he says he is going to do, he would have to run the WORLD. What a wing-nut. He may be popular with his mind-numbed followers, but the general public is way to smart to vote for this foolishness.
 
 
Notice that they have disabled both comments and ratings for this video! Know why? I do!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One last post today on the election

Here are my thoughts about this year's election. Who cares? I keep hearing liberal commentators talking about McCain and that Republicans should get behind him. Why? He represents nothing that we stand for. We do not want an (R) in the whitehouse that acts like a Democrat. Maybe Democrats feel that way (a Democrat at any cost), but conservatives don't vote that way. We don't usually support someone like Chuck Hagel or Olympia Snow just because they are Republicans. They are LIBERALS first, Republicans second.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What choice do we have?

On the Republican side, we have McCain who has constantly voted with the Democrats during his time in the Senate. Now, suddenly, he's talking about Conservative values. Talk is cheap. He has undermined Republicans at every turn, voting against extending Bush's tax cuts, trying to sneak an illegal amnesty bill through the senate with Ted Kennedy, the gang of 14, campaign finance reform with Feingold... and the list goes on.
 
On the Democrat side it is a little trickier. First you have Hillary whose experience in the whitehouse was First Lady... hardly a policy making position. Then you have the health care fiasco that was soundly pushed back. Do we really want more of this socialist agenda? More big government nanny state legislation. But she does have one more term of experience as Senator of New York over Obama... though she has hardly participated in any significant legislation. I don't think "just showing up to vote" qualifies as experience.
 
Obama... what can I say? His followers are like the Beatles with the Maharaji. Star struck and wide eyed. Fainting? It's being called Obamania. Remember Beatlemania? It's like a spiritual revival all over again. And about what? Do any of his followers know where he stands on policies? I do.
 
He's about change. His website says so on the home page... "Change you can believe in". Hitler was a change from the way things had been run in Europe before he rose to power. That's not necessarily a good thing. Don't misunderstand, I am not comparing him to Hitler. My point is that change is not always for the better!
 
Not only that, but he's asking us to BELIEVE in change. Does he really think he can change Washington by himself? Let's see what that change involves, shall we? From the Blueprint for Change:
  1. He's going to end lobbyists... So that means if you band together to support a common cause, your voice will not be heard. Does that mean teachers unions no longer will have a say about education? We'll see about that.
  2. Shine the light on spending... Most people have not been paying attention to how our government wastes money otherwise they would not vote for liberals over and over again. But if you elect him that's going to change, and everyone will become involved. As Dr. Evil would say, "Righttttt....."
  3. Reform the political appointee process... does he realize that Demcrats have caused the president to make decision on appointees thanks to Senate oversight rules? But he's going to change that all by himself? Again, we'll see.
  4. Universal health care coverage... This one scares me the most. And all politicians are guilty of buying into the premise that we need MORE government to fix the health care industry. It's the government regulations that have gotten us to where we are (with the help of outrageous lawsuits) and driven up costs. Can you imagine some bureaucrat, who has absolutely no experience in running a business, managing the nation's health care system? Picture the same people who are running security at the airport. Then realize that they are going to be the same ones running the health care system.

    And it's all going to be FREE???? Services will suffer and wait times to see doctors will increase as every hypocondriac in the country takes your appointment so that you have to wait a year to be treated for a cold. Simplified paperwork. We can't do it for the IRS and our tax forms, but the health care will be different! You're dreaming, Mr. Obama! Washington LOVES paperwork! 

I can't go on. Read it for yourself. It is so broad-stroked and vapid that this column would go on forever... Kind of like this election cycle. But rest assured... Hillary or Obama, it's socialism-lite. They will get away with as much as they can... incrementally if necessary. Look at where we started with the Boston Tea Party and where we are now with taxes. Incremental-ism.

I hold the media responsible for not telling the truth. Instead they push these different problems as something government should fix. We should fix the media... Solution? Castration!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Want another 9/11? Vote Obama, Hillary or McCain!

Tuesday there was a vote in the Senate on the FISA (Foreign surveillance) and to his credit, John McCain voted for it. But how are we going to catch the bad guys when we close Gitmo and give the enemy combatants citizens' rights? What a wimp.
 
Obama voted against it. How are we going to catch the bad guys BEFORE they attack us? Call the psychic hotline?
 
Clinton didn't show up to even vote. Too self-centered about getting the presidency to do her job as senator? 
 
Just some observations from Thursday morning.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »