About Me

Name: Mick O.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Buckley's Son Is An Idiot...

Sorry, Bill, but your son, Christopher, is a moron. A recent column on The Daily Beast website quotes him as saying he will vote for Obama because of the following:
"Republican John McCain has betrayed his principals. McCain has changed positions on important issues, made promises he cannot keep, endorsed unworkable policies, and selected the inexperienced Sarah Palin as his running mate, Buckley writes."
 
This from the son of one great conservative of our times. Regardless of what positions McCain takes, they can not be as dangerous as the socialist agenda Obama will push once he has the White House and majorities in both the Senate and the House. The reason we are where we are is because Democrats are not afraid to push legislation when they are in power. Republicans seem to be afraid to govern like conservatives. But Obama has PROMISED to raise taxes. He has PROMISED all sorts of socialist programs. Why would anyone begrudge McCain for being soft on some things? At least he is RIGHT on some! Obama is NOT.
 
And then we come to the inexperience of Sarah Palin. Is this guy smoking crack? Sarah Palin is a hearbeat away... but Obama IS the heartbeat! He has less experience than Palin by a long shot. At least she has run a city and a state as mayor and governor. I just don't understand Buckley's insanity!
 
I have never been thrilled with McCain as our candidate. But against Obama, it is dumb and dumber. I'll leave it to you to decide who I think is which one!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Crime Too Small For Democrats

I have been over at FedUpNetwork.com posting there for the last few months. My main focus has been on the energy issue and lowering gas prices. With my attention to this, the spectrum has broadened to include environmental issues which have hindered our ability to drill for our own oil. It's a shame that the left wing nuts think it has to be all or nothing. Surely there's a solution somewhere in the middle, but not to extremists.
 
For instance, hackers stealing Sarah Palin's e-mail. No crime is too small for a Democrat, it seems. As I have posted in other columns, liberals seem to think they can ignore the laws they don't agree with because they don't think it's right. But let a conservative do it, and the press is all over them. Look at the support Gavin Newsom got for marrying gay people in San Francisco despite the fact that it broke a state law. I really don't care if they marry, but change the law before you do.
 
These hackers are scum of the earth. They should be found, tried, found guilty and then drawn and quartered as an example. Of course, I am half-joking, but let these jerks get away with it and what's to stop them from stealing other secrets? We have set a precedent if we let them get away with this one.
 
I say hang 'em high.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Counting their chickens...

Democrats are counting their chickens before they have hatched when it comes to President Obama. The longer the campaign goes on (and it seems like it has lasted FOREVER!) the less enchanted citizens are becoming of the Democrats' choice for their candidate. As what happened in 2004, they put up the worst candidate they could find to run against a very vulnerable Bush.
 
This time they put all their eggs (back to the chickens metaphor) in a basket of the candidate they think has very little baggage and offers "hope" and "change". Once again, with a weak candidate on the Republican side, they are being guided by rabid anti-Bush liberals who are blind to the truth that Obama has no experience... in anything and would vote for Ariana Huffington if she were on the ticket! What they fail to realize is that the rest of us have a vote too.
 
I might vote Democrat if the right candidate presented him or herself. But Obama is not that person. He as all but told us that he is going to raise taxes and grow government, particularly because these two issues make Democrat wins more possible. And as weak as McCain is (Republicans have made a similar mistake but fortunately have chosen someone who at least has experience!) he is better than Obama. And I predict in the fall we will be talking about President McCain.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When I was a Democrat

When I think about liberals and how to persuade them of the truth, I go back to the past when I was a radical liberal Democrat, anti-war, anti-rich, etc. and try and devise talking points to change their minds as mine has been changed. It's not an easy task since once the change is made, it is hard to go back to that type of thinking.
 
Over 18 years ago, I was a dead broke alcholic, mad at the world because of my situation. After all, was I not a nice guy, a single guy trying to split time with my ex-wife to raise our daughter and make a living. The world was against me as I drove around in my beat-up Chevy Sprint shooting black smoke out the tailpipe delivering newspapers in the early morning and pizzas in the evening. Up to that point I had voted Democrat in every single election and my situation had not improved, no matter whether Democrats or Republicans were elected.
 
Make no mistake. I am not blaming either political party for my situation... not now. But at the time I wanted to punish those rich guys that were keeping me down, not willing to look at alcohol or my attitude as being the cause of my dilemna. In other words, I was the problem.
 
In 1989 I had an epihphany and realized that I was the master of my destiny. I can't explain how it came about, but after years of listening to tapes of Dr. Dennis Waitley, Dr. Wayne Dyer and other Nightingale-Conant motivational speakers, something clicked. Regardless of who I voted for, I was responsible for the good and the bad things in my life. That's when my life started to improve. If I was responsible for the bad things, then I could also make things better if I chose to. One of those secrets was blame.
 
"Losers fix the blame... winners fix what caused the problem" is one of my favorite truisms. Politics is all about blame, don't you agree?And the news is all about pointing to who is to blame (Katrina). And regardless of what the truth is, Republicans are usually named. If it's a Democrat the party affiliation is usually way down in the story. Check it out and you will see I am telling the truth. If it's a Republican it's on or near the front page. If it's a Democrat, it's usually buried.
 
Recently my column has come under fire by liberals who hate free speech. One of my buddies over at ww.FedUpNetwork.com got a note from some liberal who accused him of being in bed with the oil companies. How absurd. So if you support more drilling to bring down gas prices for you and your family, you must be a oil hack, right? What does that make people who don't support drilling? In bed with enviro-Nazis? No. In that same e-mail I was called a lot of nasty names because I say what I believe. Tough. I am not going to shut up. The truth is the truth, not the truth because of WHO says it.
 
For example, headlines say, "Bush administration suffers setback as courts rule for terrorists" or something like that. The truth is, doesn't the United States suffer, not just Bush? Isn't that a setback for you and me? I think so. Of course, there are a lot of people who live here and have had it so easy that they can afford to be anti-American. Nothing has been required of them. They sit back with their trust funds and support the liberal causes because it makes them feel good to give money to these wonderful causes, never looking at the results that come from them. It's EASY to sit back and call our heroes in the military horrible names and accuse them of committing unspeakable acts without a single shred of evidence or accuse oil executives of gouging consumers or manipulating gasoline prices without knowing the first thing about economics or the oil industry.
 
I will expand on this in days to come.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media lies by omission

 I have been thinking about this for several months now, and I am truly disappointed by the media. Actually, I am not. I have come to expect it. It's obvious that the media has a liberal bias and broadcasts news stories with that in mind. How did it become so? One acronym... the AP (Associated Press). All news outlets get their news from the AP. And more and more, opinon is being reported as fact.
 
Worse, is the fact that liars are not being called to account for their fabrications. You think I am exaggerating? How then do you explain that most politicians who are now opponents of the war actually voted for it. In fact, some of them (Kennedy, Kerry, Clinton, Gore etc.) were saying the same things when Clinton was President that Bush is saying now? Because the truth is not the truth? BULL! And the media refuses to call Murtha, Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Woolsey, et al LIARS!
 
People need to wake up and look at these liars for what they are and then throw them out of office. Why anyone would vote for this Democratic Party is beyond me unless you are a rabid anti-Bush basher. Democrats are behind the smoking bans which is an assault on freedom. Yet who smokes? Studies show for the most part, poor people practice this habit. And how do poor people usually vote? Democrat. So people are actually voting for people who are curtailing their feedoms. Yet they howl in the House and Senate when the President puts the FISA bill into action to protect the citizens calling it the biggest assault on our feedom. Democrats are the biggest assault on freedom.
 
Don't agree? Let me ask you these questions:
  • Who is limiting where PRIVATE companies can drill for oil and build refineries? Republicans or Democrats?
  • Who is trying to pass a ban on plastic bottled water in San Francisco? Republicans or Democrats?
  • Who is trying to ban plastic bags at grocery stores? Republicans or Democrats?
  • Who made us switch from paper to plastic bags in grocery stores? Republicans or Democrats?
  • Who is forcing Californians to go hands free with their cellular telephones? California is RUN by Democrats!
  • Who is forcing incandescent bulbs out of the market place and mandating CFL bulbs? Republicans or Democrats?
  • Who forced television broadcasters to go HD and then came up with a fund to help people make the conversion on their sets? Republicans or Democrats?
Look, I can site many more examples where liberals have chipped away at our freedoms and rights by incrementally passing legislation that we're told is aimed at protecting us. But time and time again, they are passing laws that prohibit gas exploration while driving up our gas prices. Go to www.FedUpNetwork.com and sign the petitions and get involved in turning back this rabid environmentlism that has done nothing to stem the so-called man made global warming... because it can't be done! It's the sun's fault! No amount of taxation and regulation is going to stop the earth from warming... if it is even happening at all! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why isn't the media telling us about Nancy Pelosi's outrageous statements?

I thought the Democrats were for the seasoned citizens. Aren't they the ones who are supposedly protecting the retirees from the evil Republicans? So why is Nancy Pelosi proposing the following?
 
==============================

Windfall Tax on Retirement Income

Anyone who understands a flat monetary system, our system, knows that most retirement funds lose real value and are not exactly what a person hopes for at the end of their work life. Some are, and those typically go to people in the public sector. We contribute greatly to those through a myriad of taxes.

Adding a tax to your retirement is simply another way of saying to the American people, you're so damned stupid that we're going to keep doing this until we drain every cent from you. That's what the speaker of the House is saying. Read below...............

Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. This woman is a nut case! You aren't going to believe this.

Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a Windfall Tax on all stock market profits (including Retirement fund, 401Ks and Mutual Funds! Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 Million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed Minorities!

Boy, are we in trouble... This woman is frightening. She quotes..." We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied:  "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'."

This outrageous that anyone would propose taxing seniors to give to the illegal aliens! I hope this is not true, or if it is, doesn't gain any traction, but liberals have given our country to those who do not produce anything and punish those who do. It's time for a change all right. But Democrats are NOT it! We need someone to bring reason back into politics.
 
Next time around, Democrats need to dump Pelosi and get some real leadership with vision! Not a socialist who is bent on destroying what's left of our great country! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Your tax dollars at work... Traitors!

Why do the media and some bureaucrats hate Bush so much that they would lie and distort the truth to undermine policy and hurt America? It is unbelievable that liberals would have such hate in their hearts that they would purposely pull off some of the slimiest politics ever known to the United States.
 
In the past, no matter who the president was and even if they were not of his party, bureaucrats supported, for the most part, the president's policies. This is no longer true. As the Democratic party and rabid liberals run rampant in today's politics, it seems to be a traitor is now fashionable. I hope they think so when it is their turn to be in power! Remember, what goes around, comes around! Personally I can't wait to dish it out. They have set the bar!
 
I am currently reading a book called "Shadow Warriors" by Kenneth R. Timmerman and it is literally sickening how liberals in the bureaucracy are purposely acting to undermine the president without considering the possibility they might be hurting the country in doing so. It is as if their little games are isolated from the real world consequences. Personally I think they should be hung for treason.
 
Want some names of people who are despicable human debris? I am only half way through the book and here are a few names. The first that comes to mind is Jerry Bremer. If it weren't for his actions, Iraq may well have had a government ready to be put in place at the fall of Saddam. So if there is a quagmire in Iraq, he owns it, not Bush. Bush is only guilty because he wasn't paying attention and trusted this A-hole to do his job. Valerie Plame and  Joe Wilson make the list for obvious reasons... because they are LIARS! They were shadow warriors bent on making Bush look bad. In reading this book, they only make themselves look bad.
 
Leslie Stahl is a hysterical lib reporter for 60 Minutes. You may not know that because very few people are watching it these days due to its one-sided reporting of "news". ABB (Anyone but Bush) is her motto. ABL is mine.
 
Senator Carl Levin is a dirtbag. Not only is he representative for a state that has gone to pot since the Democrats have gotten control of it, but if it were up to him, we would not have a department to help defend our country. Once again, he is a partisan hack who is only interested in his party getting and retaining power, not in the best interests of the country.
 
Paul Pillar, Rand Beers, Stephen R. Happes, Mike Sulick, John McLaughlin, Mary Margaret Graham and David Shedd are all complicit and named in the book along with their offenses. As far as I am concerned, they belong in Gitmo as enemy combatants because of their smug arrogance. They need to be brought down a peg... but their time will come. If McCain gets elected, I suspect he will clean house and they will all be collecting unemployment as they should be!
 
Over and over again, this book points out how these bureaucratic malcontents have been bent of subverting the interests of the United States just to get their way. It's like the bullies we used to run into on the playground, only with more dire consequences. If you are a liberal and support this kind of behavior, then you are just as despicable. If you aren't then you should be outraged by this behavior.
 
And who is the biggest scumbag liar? The MEDIA for not reporting any of this.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What the media doesn't tell you about liberals... they're angry and unhappy!

The drive-by medial lies all the time. What they don't tell you about liberals is that they are the source of hate and anger in this country. But that's because they believe in the cause. It doesn't matter what the result is, it is the good intentions that trump all. Don't take it from me. Look at the facts.
 
Detroit has been been run by Democrats and liberals for decades and what has happened? Poverty. Unemployment. High taxes. Crime. And who do the people there keep voting for? Democrats and liberals. Seems kind of stupid, don't you think? That people would eventually wake up to the fact that, though liberals profess to stand for the little guy, what they produce is crimminal in the greatest country on earth! If they wanted to help the little guy, don't you think they would get rid of some of the regulations that are hurting industries and keeping them from creating jobs?
 
New Orleans is another example of liberalism's results. By all accounts, you would think that by voting in Democrats over and over again, the place would have been a panacea for all the city's ills. But what happened? Graft and corruption, money never getting to the projects that would have kept Hurricane Katrina on the back pages. Instead, they blame Bush for not responding fast enough and Republicans for putting them in this situation instead of taking responsibility and admitting that it is liberals who are to blame for the city's problems!
 
On to San Francisco. These are some of the meanest and most unhappy people on the planet. Who is the city run by an who lives there? Liberals! And there, even Democrats are too conservative for the masses. And if you don't believe me about them being some of the meanest, most angry people, try this. Do a mass mail campaign or e-mail campaign to citizens of San Francisco and see what happens. I guarantee you will get at least a dozen hate mails and/or hatefull calls telling you to take them off your list. Or you might even be reported to the government's SPAM program. Trust me, we've been there. It's like these folks have nothing to do but sit by the phone or mailbox and then look for people to be angry with. It's very sad, but this is what you get from a liberal.
 
More about San Francisco. Now liberals want to outlaw bottled water. They forget that they wanted everyone off soda years ago, so the soft drink companies responded to their whining by offereing clean, healthy water in bottles. Now there is a push to ban bottled water from being sold in the City. And remember the paper bags in grocery stores years ago? The environmentalists wanted to save the trees so they pushed everyone to adopt plastic bags to "save the trees". So what happened between then and now? They must have realized that plastics are a derivitave of oil. Oil is bad. So now they want to ban the plastic grocery bags... or at least tax them to help pay for their disposal. We already do! It's called garbage service!
 
The latest is they are pushing those reusable cloth bags. Once they find out those are being made in third world countries by children who are being paid $0.50 a day, they will be against them too. It never ends with these people which proves one thing............ LIBERALS HAVE TOO MUCH TIME ON THEIR HANDS!!! I say get a job, get off welfare and take pride in your country, you morons!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain - Democrat LITE?

Dick Morris is wrong to advise McCain to beat the Democrats by out-liberal"ing" them. What a crock. The last thing we need as a country is 3 candidates with the same view on every issue. And that's what we have.
 
Which one said we need to set policy so that we can defeat global warming? All of them. If anything, we need a leader with common ense. And McCain has none of it.
 
He is committed to shutting down Gitmo and giving enemy combatants citizens' rights. As an ex-POW who is pro-military, you would think he would get it. But he does not. In fact, I have not even heard Hillary or Obama talk about this folly.
 
I know Republicans are screwed this election cycle. Hopefully we can hold out until 2012 and get a candidate who really stands for something. McCain will not win the election, if Democrats have their way. I've read Shadow Warriors, so I know what liberals are capable of!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media lies about Iraq by omission

The scurvy weasels that call themselves the media have been focused on the anti-war protests going on around the anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, but what they do not publish are the following statistics from an e-mail making the internet circuit.
 
Did you know that 47 countries' have reestablished their embassies in Iraq ? 

Did you know that the Iraqi government currently employs 1.2 million Iraqi people? 

Did you know that 3100 schools have been renovated, 364 schools are under rehabilitation, 263 new schools are now under construction; and 38 new schools have been completed in Iraq ? 

Did you know that Iraq 's higher educational structure consists of 20 Universities, 46 Institutes or colleges and 4 research centers,
 all currently operating? 

Did you know that 25 Iraq students departed for the United States in January 2005 for the re-established Fulbright program? 

Did you know that the Iraqi Navy is operational? They have 5 - 100-foot patrol craft, 34 smaller vessels and a naval infantry regiment. 

Did you know that Iraq's Air Force consists of three operational squadrons, which includes 9 reconnaissance and 3 US C-130 transport aircraft (under Iraqi operational control) which operate day and night, and will soon add 16 UH-1 helicopters and 4 Bell Jet Rangers? 

Did you know that Iraq has a counter-terrorist unit and a Commando Battalion? 

Did you know that the Iraqi Police Service has over 55,000 fully trained and equipped police officers? 

Did you know that there are 5 Police Academies in Iraq that produce over 3500 new officers every 8 weeks? 

Did you know there are more than 1100 building projects going on in Iraq? They include 364 schools, 67 public clinics, 15 hospitals,
83 railroad stations, 22 oil facilities, 93 water facilities and 69 electrical facilities. 

Did you know that 96% of Iraqi children under the age of 5 have received the first 2 series of polio vaccinations? 

Did you know that 4.3 million Iraqi children were enrolled in primary school by mid October? 

Did you know that there are 1,192,000 cell phone subscribers in Iraq and phone use has gone up 158%? 

Did you know that Iraq has an independent media that consists of 75 radio stations, 180 newspapers and 10 television stations? 

Did you know that the Baghdad Stock Exchange opened in June of 2004? 

Did you know that 2 candidates in the Iraqi presidential election had a televised debate recently?
 
These are all things you will probably never know unless you go somewhere to find the truth. Our media has all become one-sided and it is not on the side of truth. Every day we are inundated with stories with global warming as the undertone whether it's a story about the environment, energy or animals. Daily we are treated to the wrongs that police perpetrate on those poor, mistreated crimminals so that now only the people who follow the law are in trouble. And finally, we have a presidential candidate who promises to bring us together while he listens to a minister who preaches hate of America and the white race. And he is going to represent all of us? NO THANKS!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What the media doesn't tell you - liberalism doesn't work!

If liberalism worked, then California would not be in the trouble it is in financially. Take this as an example of what liberalism does when it's tried.
 
True we have a Republican governor, but he is by no means a conservative. He is another John McCain... trying to get along with both sides. And what is the result? More and more debt... and that's without an expensive Iraq war to use as an excuse of where the money is going!
 
Example one of how liberal ideas don't work: People in California are being rewarded with a tax credit for buying the Toyota "Pious" and other hybrids because they save gasoline. They get more miles to the gallon than regular automobiles and SUVs. Sounds like a good idea, right?
 
So what happens is that our little lemmings go out and buy the hype. There are probably more hybrids per square mile in California than anywhere in the US. As a result, not as many gallons of gas are being consumed. Good you say? Not for the tax and spend liberals who are running California. Instead of balancing the budget and doing away with programs that don't work, they need your tax dollars. But now that people are not buying as much gas, they are not getting the tax revenue they were expecting!
 
I am told that there are about $0.45 or more per gallon of gas and with people using less gas, that means less taxes for the greedy government. So what are they discussing now? In a place where we already have some of the highest prices per gallon of gas in the nation, they are talking about adding a new gas tax at the pump to increase revenue!
 
But wait, isn't big oil being blamed for the high prices??? And what about all the ethanol (made from corn) that's being used? I thought oil was the problem? So you're saying that if we went to 100% ethanol we would still be paying the same price for "gas"? That's right. In fact, not only will ethanol cost the same or more than gasoline (because it is so hard to transport), it has side effects.
 
Because corn is used for our food sources, those prices are rising as more and more corn is being used as "gasoline". As it becomes more scarce, prices to feed livestock rise and so this cost is being passed on to consumers when they buy dairy or meat products. Corn is also used in many processed foods, so these are going up too.
 
All this because we want to wean ourselves off foreign oil! That's just one liberal idea that has backfired on the powers that be. I for one can't wait to see what they come up with next!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals are hypocrites!

They say they are peace activists. So what are they doing blowing up a recruiting office in New York? That's not peaceful. Once again it shows how wrong the peace movement. They want peace... but only if they don't have to be. Idiots all!!!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can you tell people's political party by their footwear?

I can. But it's easy when you live in liberal Mill Valley. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting a Democrat. And there's an Obama sign in every other yard.
 
What surprises me is the number of those ugly Crocs I see. You know, those plastic gardening shoes they sell for about $5 a pair? Can you believe that anyone would think that a pair of green, plastic shower shoes are considered dresswear?
 
Second place goes to the leather slip ons with no back. They used to be called sabots (I think).
 
Third place goes to the leather klogs.
 
What do these three shoes have in common? They are easy to slip on... just like liberal policies... gutless! Just as liberal policies are easy to buy if you are a Democrat because they absolve people completely of their personal responsibilities. And just like their policies, their shoes reflect their sheep-like personalities.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bipartisan is NOT

Has anyone else noticed that when the media talks about bipartisanship it means that Republicans have sided with Democrats? Why is it that nobody ever talks about it when Democrats refuse to compromise their positions?

Bipartisanship means both sides need to give a little. But when Republicans (conservatives) stick to their position and insist that liberals cross the aisle, that's not considered bipartisanship. Why not? It's like saying, "I am ready to compromise as long as you decide to do it my way!"
 
That's all I have today. I am sick of it. Screw bipartisanship! 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberalism is the WORST type of selfishness

Let me see if I can explain this in a way that people will understand. It makes sense to me, but sometimes putting things into words is a little more difficult. As with God, you can't explain it, you just believe.
 
Just so with liberalism. This morning it hit me as I listened to Friday's podcast of Rush Limbaugh, that his explanation of the events of the campus shooting was right on. This was a GUN FREE zone! So the gunman had no reason to fear that anyone would take him out before he accomplished his mission... to kill people. Just because the campus wished that it was a gun free zone doesn't make it so.
 
So I started asking myself some questions. Why are the same people who want to take the guns out of everyone's hands the same people who refuse to prosecute those who use them to commit crimes? Think about it. So the easy part will be to take away guns from law abiding citizens, but the hard, impossible really, part will be getting them from the crimminals.
 
There are actually people out there who think everyone is the same with the same wishes and desires and if we just reason with them all will be right with the world. We will have peace and everyone will sing Kumbaya or We are the World, hold hands and eat a tofu burger before driving off in their Toyota "Pious". Isn't that the ultimate form of selfishness?
 
First of all to think that their way is the ONLY way, and that their thinking is the same as GOD CONSCIOUSNESS. How self-centered. It's like those liberal programs. As long as the intent is right, the program must be good. It doesn't work, but don't look at the results. Of course the money spent on these programs would be better used if dropped off at the homeless shelter in a wheel barrow rather than filtered through the various public servants who syphon off their weekly salary before turning the crumbs left over to the needy. I often hear these people saying that they chose their job so they could give back... BULL! Selfishness, that's why they took the job. To pay their bills. To feed themselves and their children. To put gas in their Toyota "Pious". If you don't believe me, witness how they treat their "clients". That's what social workers call their cases now because it gives the homeless person more dignity. Like being called a client makes up for sleeping under a bridge.
 
I am very generous in my lifestyle and reward people for trying to do the right thing. I don't need the government syphoning off tax money that I earn to pay for people to do the good deeds for me. Simple as that. So in my opinion, liberals are actually selfish in that they would rather be taxed and let the government do the hard work rather than do it themselves. It's gutless and it's lazy. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »